Treffer: Validity of an Online Assessment to Appraise Teacher Progress Monitoring Ability

Title:
Validity of an Online Assessment to Appraise Teacher Progress Monitoring Ability
Language:
English
Authors:
Source:
Assessment for Effective Intervention. 2025 51(1):3-9.
Availability:
SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed:
Y
Page Count:
7
Publication Date:
2025
Sponsoring Agency:
Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
Contract Number:
R324B210002
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
Education Level:
Early Childhood Education
Preschool Education
DOI:
10.1177/15345084251366206
ISSN:
1534-5084
1938-7458
IES Funded:
Yes
Entry Date:
2025
Accession Number:
EJ1489478
Database:
ERIC

Weitere Informationen

Ongoing professional development is a critical component of high-quality early childhood education systems. To guide the content of such professional development, teacher and classroom quality assessments are often used. These assessments generally address universal or tier 1 instruction but omit information to guide teachers' practices to support children with disabilities. In addition, these assessments can be particularly onerous to deliver given that they require direct observation by a trained rater. As a step toward supporting the professional development of teachers serving children with disabilities, we evaluated a revised version of a newly developed resource-sensitive assessment called the "Brief Preschool Progress Monitoring Measure." The assessment functioned as an online, test-based measure, to be completed by a teacher. The assessment provided information about teachers' abilities with collecting and using progress monitoring data to individualize instruction for children needing interventions and supports beyond those typically provided at tier 1 of a support system. Using Rasch analysis, findings revealed strong unidimensionality and item reliability, though limitations exist in detecting extreme ability levels. The revised assessment demonstrates potential as a tool for supporting targeted professional development initiatives and program evaluation in early childhood education but should not be incorporated into teacher accountability systems.

As Provided