Treffer: Tablet-Based Arithmetic Fluency Assessment Reveals Developments in Math Cognition and Math Achievement from Childhood to Adolescence

Title:
Tablet-Based Arithmetic Fluency Assessment Reveals Developments in Math Cognition and Math Achievement from Childhood to Adolescence
Language:
English
Authors:
Ethan Roy (ORCID 0000-0002-4956-2237), Mathieu Guillaume, Amandine Van Rinsveld, Project iLead Consortium, Bruce D. McCandliss (ORCID 0000-0001-9393-3421)
Source:
npj Science of Learning. 2025 10.
Availability:
Nature Portfolio. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://www.nature.com/npjscilearn/
Peer Reviewed:
Y
Page Count:
13
Publication Date:
2025
Sponsoring Agency:
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Contract Number:
NSFSLCN1540854
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
Education Level:
Early Childhood Education
Elementary Education
Grade 3
Primary Education
Grade 5
Intermediate Grades
Middle Schools
Grade 7
Junior High Schools
Secondary Education
DOI:
10.1038/s41539-025-00314-5
ISSN:
2056-7936
Entry Date:
2025
Accession Number:
EJ1468769
Database:
ERIC

Weitere Informationen

Arithmetic fluency is regarded as a foundational math skill, typically measured as a single construct with pencil-and-paper-based timed assessments. We introduce a tablet-based assessment of single-digit fluency that captures individual trial response times across several embedded experimental contrasts of interest. A large (n = 824) cohort of 3rd-7th grade students (ages 7-13 years) completed this task, revealing effects of operation and problem size in "common" problems (i.e., 5 + 3) often examined in studies of mathematical cognition. We also characterize performance on "exceptional" problems (i.e., 4 + 4), which are typically included in fluency tests, yet excluded from most cognitive studies. Overall, individuals demonstrated higher fluency on exceptional problems compared to common problems. However, common problems better predicted standardized tests scores and exhibited distinct patterns of speed-accuracy tradeoffs relative to exceptional problems. The affordances of tablet-based assessment to quantify multiple cognitive dynamics within chained fluency tests present several advantages over traditional assessments, thus enriching the study of arithmetic fluency development at scale.

As Provided