Vom 20.12.2025 bis 11.01.2026 ist die Universitätsbibliothek geschlossen. Ab dem 12.01.2026 gelten wieder die regulären Öffnungszeiten. Ausnahme: Medizinische Hauptbibliothek und Zentralbibliothek sind bereits ab 05.01.2026 wieder geöffnet. Weitere Informationen

Treffer: Forensic Analysis of Manipulated Images and Videos.

Title:
Forensic Analysis of Manipulated Images and Videos.
Source:
Applied Sciences (2076-3417); Dec2025, Vol. 15 Issue 23, p12664, 26p
Database:
Complementary Index

Weitere Informationen

The transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 emphasizes the need for ethical, transparent, and human-centric artificial intelligence systems. In this context, ensuring the authenticity of digital information has become crucial for maintaining societal trust. This study addresses the challenge of detecting manipulated multimedia content, including synthetic images, videos, and audio generated by artificial intelligence, commonly known as Deepfakes. We analyze and compare general-purpose and Deepfake-specific detection methods to assess their effectiveness in real-world scenarios. This work introduces a refined reference model that integrates both application-oriented and methodological criteria, grouping tools into Blind Forensic, Handcrafted Machine Learning, Deep Learning-based methods, and Toolkits. This structured taxonomy provides a clearer comparative framework than existing works, which typically classify detectors using only one of these dimensions. To ensure reproducible evaluation, all experiments were performed using the SAFL dataset, which consolidates real and synthetic multimedia content generated with publicly available tools under a unified protocol. Among the tested tools, Forensically achieved the highest accuracy in image forgery detection 86.9%, while Autopsy reached 69.5% among Deepfake-specific image detectors. In video analysis, Forensically obtained 98.6% accuracy, whereas Deepware Scanner achieved 91.2% as the most effective Deepfake-focused tool. These results highlight that general-purpose methods remain robust for images, while specialized detectors perform competitively in videos. Overall, the proposed model and dataset establish a consistent foundation for advancing hybrid detection strategies aligned with the ethical and transparent AI principles envisioned in Industry 5.0. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Applied Sciences (2076-3417) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)