Treffer: Same Same yet Different: Equivalence of the Multidimensional Assessment of Vocational Competence across Test Formats

Title:
Same Same yet Different: Equivalence of the Multidimensional Assessment of Vocational Competence across Test Formats
Language:
English
Authors:
Beifang Ma (ORCID 0000-0002-6371-6829), Maximilian Krötz (ORCID 0000-0003-4302-5390), Viola Deutscher (ORCID 0000-0002-9714-6465), Esther Winther (ORCID 0000-0002-5390-4041)
Source:
International Journal of Training and Development. 2025 29(4):433-448.
Availability:
Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed:
Y
Page Count:
16
Publication Date:
2025
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
DOI:
10.1111/ijtd.12372
ISSN:
1360-3736
1468-2419
Entry Date:
2025
Accession Number:
EJ1488466
Database:
ERIC

Weitere Informationen

The rapid digital transformation of vocational education and training (VET) has underscored the need to adapt traditional assessment methods to digital formats. However, when transitioning to digital modes, it is crucial to consider factors beyond mere technical implementation, particularly the potential impact of altered presentation formats on the validity of assessment outcomes. This study explores these considerations in the context of computer-based assessments, focusing on validating a digital format for evaluating vocational-economic competence. A particular emphasis was placed on ensuring measurement invariance between digital and paper-pencil formats, taking into account the effects of assessment layout, including cognitive load, the split-attention effect, and environmental factors such as context dependence and the digital literacy of test-takers. Furthermore, this study outlines a guideline-compliant validation procedure for the digital version of a vocational-economic competence assessment. To achieve this, we employed multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) and a multidimensional item response theory (IRT) model to assess measurement invariance and estimate person abilities across the two formats. Validity evidence obtained includes both measurement invariance across subgroups and the assessment's dimensionality.

As Provided