Treffer: A Scoping Review of Current Approaches to Strengths-Based Transition Practices for Autistic Adolescents

Title:
A Scoping Review of Current Approaches to Strengths-Based Transition Practices for Autistic Adolescents
Language:
English
Authors:
Sophie Rumsa (ORCID 0000-0002-5425-7587), Bahareh Afsharnejad (ORCID 0000-0003-2825-7265), Elinda Ai Lim Lee (ORCID 0000-0002-2634-0818), Sven Bölte (ORCID 0000-0002-4579-4970), Tele Tan, Sonya Girdler
Source:
Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice. 2025 29(11):2644-2661.
Availability:
SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed:
Y
Page Count:
18
Publication Date:
2025
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses
DOI:
10.1177/13623613251346336
ISSN:
1362-3613
1461-7005
Entry Date:
2025
Accession Number:
EJ1487344
Database:
ERIC

Weitere Informationen

This review aimed to map the literature surrounding strengths-based approaches in studies with autistic adolescents focusing on adult transition outcomes, by describing the active ingredients of interventions and the properties of assessment tools. Relevant databases were searched for articles surrounding strengths-based practices, which met the following criteria: (a) written in English, (b) published since 1990, and (c) involving adolescent participants with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. Data extraction included sample, aim, intervention description, outcome measures, and results. Data were synthesised using a descriptive approach and thematic analysis was conducted to identify active ingredients, practice strategies, outcomes, and assessment properties. Overall, 35 articles met the inclusion criteria, including 26 studies evaluating strengths-based interventions and 9 articles relating to general transition outcomes. Five types of interventions were classified according to their active components: transition planning, employment preparation and training, technology programmes, peer mentoring, and cognitive skills training. The best practice themes highlighted the importance of leveraging each individual's interests and skills, developing individualised processes, and accommodating participant's needs through a holistic approach. Analysis of the outcome measures highlighted a gap in standardised strengths-based assessments, but uncovered primary outcome themes of self-determination, social skills, confidence, and work-related skills.

As Provided