• A review of the consent manage...

Treffer: A review of the consent management literature

Title:
A review of the consent management literature
Authors:
Bonnici West, Christian, Grima, Simon
Publisher Information:
MDPI
Publication Year:
2024
Collection:
University of Malta: OAR@UM / L-Università ta' Malta
Subject Terms:
Privacy, Data protection, Right of, Computer communication systems, Computer security
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift article in journal/newspaper
Language:
English
Relation:
Bonnici West, C., & Grima, S. (2024). A Review of the Consent Management Literature. Information, 15(2), 79.; https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121181
DOI:
10.3390/info15020079
Availability:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/121181
https://doi.org/10.3390/info15020079
Rights:
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.
Accession Number:
edsbas.45C3AEFC
Database:
BASE

Weitere Informationen

The richness and complexity of consent present challenges to those aiming to make related contributions to computer information systems (CIS). This paper aims to support consentrelated research in CIS by simplifying the understanding of existing literature and facilitating the framing of future consent management research. Firstly, it outlines existing consent management research and shows how it relates to the literature in law and ethics. Secondly, it presents some fundamental explanations and definitions that must be considered for further contributions to the consent management literature. Thirdly, it identifies five types of consent-related stances often taken in the consent management literature and explains each in some detail. Fourth, it explains one of the identified types of stances (i.e., the disciplinary stance) by expanding on the links between consent as a legal construct and its ethical counterpart. Fifth, considering another of the identified types of stances (i.e., the theoretical stances normally adopted in the consent management literature), the paper presents the key requirements for legally and ethically effective consent management based on three prominent theories. Sixth, it presents the identified types of stances in a conceptual model, contending that the model is novel, relevant, understandable, and useful. ; peer-reviewed