KSOLL, Korbinian, KRÄTSCHMER, Rafael und STÖCKER, Fabian, 2025. Validity of a Convolutional Neural Network-Based, Markerless Pose Estimation System Compared to a Marker-Based 3 D Motion Analysis System for Gait Assessment—A Pilot Study. Sensors (14248220). 1 November 2025. Vol. 25, no. 21, p. 6551-6568. DOI 10.3390/s25216551.
Elsevier - Harvard (with titles)Ksoll, K., Krätschmer, R., Stöcker, F., 2025. Validity of a Convolutional Neural Network-Based, Markerless Pose Estimation System Compared to a Marker-Based 3 D Motion Analysis System for Gait Assessment—A Pilot Study. Sensors (14248220) 25, 6551-6568. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25216551
American Psychological Association 7th editionKsoll, K., Krätschmer, R., & Stöcker, F. (2025). Validity of a Convolutional Neural Network-Based, Markerless Pose Estimation System Compared to a Marker-Based 3 D Motion Analysis System for Gait Assessment—A Pilot Study. Sensors (14248220), 25(21), 6551-6568. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25216551
Springer - Basic (author-date)Ksoll K, Krätschmer R, Stöcker F (2025) Validity of a Convolutional Neural Network-Based, Markerless Pose Estimation System Compared to a Marker-Based 3 D Motion Analysis System for Gait Assessment—A Pilot Study.. Sensors (14248220) 25:6551-6568. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25216551
Juristische Zitierweise (Stüber) (Deutsch)Ksoll, Korbinian/ Krätschmer, Rafael/ Stöcker, Fabian, Validity of a Convolutional Neural Network-Based, Markerless Pose Estimation System Compared to a Marker-Based 3 D Motion Analysis System for Gait Assessment—A Pilot Study., Sensors (14248220) 2025, 6551-6568.