Treffer: Systematic taxonomic framework of metaheuristic algorithms using hierarchical clustering and structural criteria: how novel is the novelty?

The proliferation of metaheuristic optimization algorithms has led to concerns about their novelty. This study introduces three key contributions to address this challenge: (1) a novel systematic taxonomic framework that employs nineteen rigorously selected, metaphor-free criteria to evaluate algorithmic distinctiveness; (2) a comprehensive clustering methodology that combines Rogers-Tanimoto distance analysis with principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering to quantify algorithmic similarities; and (3) an objective assessment method for evaluating genuine algorithmic innovations. Through the analysis of 145 metaheuristic algorithms, we demonstrate that 74 algorithms (51.0%) exhibit distances below the confidence interval threshold, indicating profound structural overlap. Network analysis reveals 26 algorithms with perfect structural identity (distance = 0.0) and 512 algorithm pairs showing high similarity (distance < 0.039), representing 18.9% of all pairwise comparisons. The results show that numerous algorithms claiming innovation deliver only incremental modifications to existing implementation patterns, lacking fundamental methodological advancement. The framework provides both a theoretical foundation for understanding algorithmic similarities and a practical tool for evaluating new algorithmic proposals, potentially transforming how the field assesses and develops novel optimization methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Artificial Intelligence Review is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)