Treffer: TOWARD A MODERNIZED FAIR USE STANDARD FOR PARODY: HARMONIZING CAMPBELL V. ACUFF-ROSE MUSIC, INC. WITH ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS, INC. V. GOLDSMITH.

The article focuses on the evolving legal standards surrounding fair use in parody, particularly in light of recent court rulings, including *Sketchworks Industries Strength Comedy, Inc. v. Jacobs* and *Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith*. It discusses how the definition of parody and its protection under the fair use doctrine has been impacted by these cases, emphasizing the need for a modernized approach to ensure that parodies can effectively comment on and critique original works without fear of infringement. The article proposes a qualified presumption of transformative use for parodies and suggests supplemental inquiries regarding the commercial nature of parodies to better balance the interests of copyright holders with the social benefits of parody as a form of expression. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Washington University Law Review is the property of Washington University School of Law and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)