Treffer: Harbor porpoises and the machine: Assisting manual validation of click trains recorded by Cetacean Porpoise Detector.

Title:
Harbor porpoises and the machine: Assisting manual validation of click trains recorded by Cetacean Porpoise Detector.
Authors:
Gauger MFW; Department of Animal Ecology, Federal Institute of Hydrology, 56068 Koblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany., Taupp T; Department of Animal Ecology, Federal Institute of Hydrology, 56068 Koblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.
Source:
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America [J Acoust Soc Am] 2026 Jan 01; Vol. 159 (1), pp. 632-646.
Publication Type:
Journal Article; Validation Study
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: American Institute of Physics Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7503051 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1520-8524 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00014966 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Acoust Soc Am Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Melville, NY : American Institute of Physics
Original Publication: Lancaster, Pa. [etc.] : American Institute of Physics for the Acoustical Society of America
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20260123 Date Completed: 20260123 Latest Revision: 20260123
Update Code:
20260123
DOI:
10.1121/10.0042220
PMID:
41575255
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) using Cetacean Porpoise Detectors (C-PODs) is a frequently applied method for studying the presence of harbor porpoises. In quiet environments, the KERNO classifier, an algorithm supplied by the manufacturer, can easily detect narrow-band high-frequency click trains emitted by echolocating harbor porpoises. However, precision is low in noisy habitats, as found in a monitoring data set (0.632; Ems, Elbe, and Wismar Bay, Germany, 2018-2023). We validated and labeled a subsample of 235 529 click trains (Elbe and Ems estuaries, 2023-2024) identified by the KERNO classifier and exported their physical characteristics to train a machine learning (ML) model. Extreme gradient boosting performed very well on the testing data (accuracy: 0.985) and the monitoring data set (0.849). The results show that the model could generalize well, beyond the training data. Moreover, this ML tool can reduce the risk of missing out low-precision estimates from random manual validation. The ML tool can complement the validation process, especially if intervals with only one click train are manually validated because false model predictions occurred particularly in these intervals. Hence, this validation tool may significantly improve the workflow in PAM studies using C-PODs, especially in noisy habitats.
(© 2026 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)