Treffer: Lessons learned in the implementation of graduation programs: The experience of Colombia, Mexico, and Paraguay.

Title:
Lessons learned in the implementation of graduation programs: The experience of Colombia, Mexico, and Paraguay.
Authors:
Teruel-Belismelis G; Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo con Equidad, Universidad Iberoamericana, CDMX 01219, Mexico. Electronic address: chele.teruel@ibero.mx., Maldonado JH; Faculty of Economics, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, 111711, Colombia. Electronic address: jmaldona@uniandes.edu.co., Peters-Castilla M; Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo con Equidad, Universidad Iberoamericana, CDMX 01219, Mexico. Electronic address: marlenepeters22@gmail.com., Triano-Enríquez M; Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo con Equidad, Universidad Iberoamericana, CDMX 01219, Mexico. Electronic address: manuel.triano@uam.mx.
Source:
Evaluation and program planning [Eval Program Plann] 2026 Apr; Vol. 115, pp. 102746. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Dec 19.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Elsevier Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 7801727 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1873-7870 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 01497189 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Eval Program Plann Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 1994- : [Oxford] : Elsevier
Original Publication: 1978-1993: Elmsford, N. Y., Pergamon Press.
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Graduation programs; Poverty; Process evaluation
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20251231 Date Completed: 20260111 Latest Revision: 20260111
Update Code:
20260112
DOI:
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102746
PMID:
41475331
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

The aim of this study is to identify systematic and generalizable strengths and weaknesses in the processes for implementing four graduation programs carried out in Colombia (2), Mexico, and Paraguay in 2015-17. The specific aims are to identify some of the key factors common to these processes and their contribution to the efficiency of program implementation, as well as to not others that may not appear in all these processes but may affect the implementation of programs and alter their results. The identification of these factors can provide empirical evidence for "lessons learned" that can facilitate their replication in other countries. The procedure is to analyze qualitative data which were collected during the process evaluation of each program from 2015 to 2018, by using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide the analysis. Constructs that strongly influence implementation effectiveness were identified through a cross- case comparison of ratings. The categories of analysis are the domains: intervention characteristics, outer settings, inner settings, characteristics of individuals and process and these were used in a concrete study of three general processes: planning, preparation, and implementation. Among the lessons learned were the importance of marketing networks for the goods and services produced by beneficiaries; the importance of leadership engagement of the field team and a good learning climate for them; the need to consider differences in the educational level of beneficiaries, their ability to run a business, and their local micro contexts in the program design.
(Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Declaration of competing interest The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.