Treffer: The impact of pre-processing techniques on deep learning breast image segmentation.
J Neurosci Methods. 2016 May 1;264:47-56. (PMID: 26945974)
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2018 Oct 04;9(4):. (PMID: 30309440)
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 17;13(1):e0191597. (PMID: 29342209)
Nat Methods. 2021 Feb;18(2):203-211. (PMID: 33288961)
Acad Radiol. 2015 Jan;22(1):33-49. (PMID: 25442800)
Nat Methods. 2024 Feb;21(2):195-212. (PMID: 38347141)
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 Jan;8(1):010901. (PMID: 33426151)
J Imaging. 2022 Aug 26;8(9):. (PMID: 36135394)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 29;119(13):e2117203119. (PMID: 35312366)
Med Image Anal. 2022 Oct;81:102529. (PMID: 35870296)
Intell Oncol. 2025 Apr;1(2):160-171. (PMID: 41020282)
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 3;15(1):1022. (PMID: 38310122)
Acad Radiol. 2012 Feb;19(2):236-48. (PMID: 22078258)
Acad Radiol. 2019 Nov;26(11):1526-1535. (PMID: 30713130)
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 30;11(9):. (PMID: 35566657)
Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Jan 22;2(1):e190015. (PMID: 33937810)
Sci Data. 2017 Dec 19;4:170177. (PMID: 29257132)
Z Med Phys. 2019 May;29(2):86-101. (PMID: 30686613)
Weitere Informationen
Breast cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer worldwide, making breast imaging a critical area for developing and evaluating Deep Learning methods. In this study, we investigate how different pre-processing techniques influence model performance in breast image segmentation. Pre-processing is a crucial step in the Deep Learning pipeline that directly impacts model performance, yet studies on its role in medical imaging remain limited. We assess the influence of different pre-processing techniques on a U-Net segmentation model applied to two breast public imaging datasets: CBIS-DDSM and Duke-Breast-Cancer-MRI. We systematically explored commonly used methods, including pixel intensity normalization, spacing harmonization, resizing/padding, and orientation standardization. Two processing pipelines were developed: Domain Non-Specific, integrating standard practices from natural and medical image analysis, and Domain Specific, which preserves anatomical information through careful handling of breast imaging metadata. A detailed comparative analysis of each pre-processing technique was conducted to evaluate its impact on model performance. Despite challenges and limitations associated with dataset size and scope, our findings identify pre-processing strategies tailored for breast imaging that can improve segmentation accuracy and analysis. This study represents an initial step in evaluating pre-processing for medical image analysis, providing a foundation for future work. Our results highlight significant differences in a 3-way ANOVA F-test ([Formula: see text]) for U-Net segmentation outcomes, attributed to different pixel intensity normalization approaches, offering valuable insights for future research.
(© 2025. The Author(s).)
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.