Treffer: Sensory reliability takes priority over the central tendency effect in temporal and spatial estimation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 10;114(2):412-417. (PMID: 28007982)
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):154-63. (PMID: 12763201)
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):6349-6362. (PMID: 38129733)
Trends Neurosci. 2004 Dec;27(12):712-9. (PMID: 15541511)
Front Integr Neurosci. 2019 Sep 12;13:51. (PMID: 31572136)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 22;111(16):6104-8. (PMID: 24711409)
Vision Res. 1999 Nov;39(23):3960-74. (PMID: 10748928)
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):508-521. (PMID: 34258708)
Nature. 2000 Dec 14;408(6814):788. (PMID: 11130706)
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6. (PMID: 9176952)
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1061-77. (PMID: 22894226)
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jun 05;14(7):926-32. (PMID: 21642976)
Hear Res. 2009 Dec;258(1-2):89-99. (PMID: 19393306)
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Oct;37(5):1383-95. (PMID: 21728465)
Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:105970. (PMID: 39368349)
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Jun;154(6):1729-1739. (PMID: 40208728)
J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 18;32(3):1056-60. (PMID: 22262903)
J Vis. 2015;15(5):22. (PMID: 26067540)
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 24;12(1):10746. (PMID: 35750891)
Curr Biol. 2016 Jan 11;26(1):R20-1. (PMID: 26766225)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 16;16:988644. (PMID: 36466622)
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(1):49-57. (PMID: 19597804)
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 10;5(9):. (PMID: 20844766)
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Oct 31;285(1890):. (PMID: 30381379)
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:307-40. (PMID: 15217335)
J Neurosci. 2005 Jul 13;25(28):6499-508. (PMID: 16014711)
Curr Biol. 2004 Feb 3;14(3):257-62. (PMID: 14761661)
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 12;364(1515):331-9. (PMID: 18986967)
Curr Biol. 2012 Sep 25;22(18):1641-8. (PMID: 22840519)
Eur J Neurosci. 2010 May;31(10):1763-71. (PMID: 20584180)
Neuroimage. 2014 Sep;98:425-34. (PMID: 24814210)
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Aug;13(8):1020-6. (PMID: 20581842)
Nat Neurosci. 2014 May;17(5):738-43. (PMID: 24686785)
PLoS Biol. 2015 Feb 24;13(2):e1002073. (PMID: 25710328)
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(11):e1002771. (PMID: 23209386)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 May;19(5):285-93. (PMID: 25843543)
Sci Rep. 2020 May 29;10(1):8767. (PMID: 32472083)
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 May 7;278(1710):1314-22. (PMID: 20961905)
Weitere Informationen
Perception is influenced by contextual factors that help resolve sensory uncertainty. A well-known phenomenon, the central tendency effect, describes how perceptual estimates gravitate toward the mean of a distribution of stimuli, particularly when sensory input is unreliable. However, in multisensory contexts, it remains unclear whether this effect follows a generalized priority across modalities or might be influenced by task-relevant sensory dominance. We studied spatial and temporal estimation in the auditory and visual modalities, testing whether perceptual estimates are driven by a supra-modal prior or by modality reliability specific to the task, and applied Bayesian modeling to explain the results. Participants first performed baseline sessions using only one modality and then a third session in which the modalities were interleaved. In the interleaved session, we found that the changes in auditory and visual estimates were not towards a supra-modal (generalized) prior, but estimates related to the dominant modality (vision for space, audition for time) were stable, while estimates of the other sensory modality (audition for space, vision for time) were pulled towards the dominant modality's prior. Bayesian modeling also confirmed that the best-fitting models were those in which priors were modality-specific rather than supra-modal. These results highlight that perceptual estimation favors sensory reliability over a general tendency to regress toward the mean, providing insights into how the brain integrates contextual information across modalities.
(© 2025. The Author(s).)
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.