Treffer: Design Mapping: A Conceptual Framework for Co-Designing Evidence-Based Digital Mental Health Programs.

Title:
Design Mapping: A Conceptual Framework for Co-Designing Evidence-Based Digital Mental Health Programs.
Authors:
Bufton K; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia., Bates M; School of Communication and Creative Arts, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia., Hamid J; Independent Consultant, Geelong, Victoria, Australia., Westrupp E; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Source:
Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy [Health Expect] 2025 Oct; Vol. 28 (5), pp. e70385.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9815926 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1369-7625 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13696513 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Health Expect Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: Oxford, UK : Wiley, c1998-
References:
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(3):116-119. (PMID: 29871870)
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):332-8. (PMID: 23664503)
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):523-539. (PMID: 32157777)
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 May 08;6(5):e12656. (PMID: 31066705)
Health Expect. 2015 Feb;18(1):32-43. (PMID: 23033910)
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 3;10(11):e038339. (PMID: 33148733)
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 29;19(6):e232. (PMID: 28663162)
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 6;9(12):e28102. (PMID: 34874893)
Front Digit Health. 2021 Nov 04;3:764079. (PMID: 34806079)
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Sep 27;15:E117. (PMID: 30264690)
Psychooncology. 2018 Apr;27(4):1138-1149. (PMID: 29247578)
J Health Psychol. 2004 Jan;9(1):85-98. (PMID: 14683571)
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;61(8):928-940. (PMID: 32572961)
Nurs Health Sci. 2010 Sep 1;12(3):369-74. (PMID: 20727089)
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 24;23(3):e24387. (PMID: 33759801)
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Sep 23;32(7):456-463. (PMID: 32696048)
Front Public Health. 2019 Aug 14;7:209. (PMID: 31475126)
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 11;7:e36815. (PMID: 37166956)
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):e0186744. (PMID: 29091935)
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):10. (PMID: 35086538)
Addiction. 2008 Mar;103(3):478-84; discussion 485-6. (PMID: 18269367)
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 10;19(5):e153. (PMID: 28490417)
Health Care Manage Rev. 2021 Apr-Jun 01;46(2):111-122. (PMID: 33630503)
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1232-1245. (PMID: 35526274)
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Mar 1;7(1):12. (PMID: 33648588)
JMIR Res Protoc. 2013 Jan 23;2(1):e6. (PMID: 23612478)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Feb 15;28(2):284-293. (PMID: 33043359)
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e038124. (PMID: 33040008)
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 30;12(3):e0174438. (PMID: 28358821)
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):637-50. (PMID: 22809132)
Front Psychiatry. 2017 May 03;8:72. (PMID: 28515699)
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021 Jun;45(3):197-199. (PMID: 33818873)
Grant Information:
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: codesign; design thinking; healthcare; intervention; mental health
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20250903 Date Completed: 20250903 Latest Revision: 20250906
Update Code:
20250906
PubMed Central ID:
PMC12405966
DOI:
10.1111/hex.70385
PMID:
40899451
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

Introduction: There is currently limited guidance on how to codesign digital mental health programs in collaboration with end-users. As a result, common barriers often prevent codesign initiatives from achieving their full potential in enhancing the effectiveness of digital mental health supports. These barriers include the exclusion of end-users from the early stages of design, a lack of attention to diversity in user experiences and needs, failure to use tools that facilitate creative and egalitarian collaboration, and prioritisation of usability over robust research methods. To address this gap, this article aims to present a novel conceptual framework, called 'Design Mapping', for developing digital mental health programs.
Methods: The Design Mapping framework was developed through a three-stage process. First, industry experts were consulted, and a review of relevant literature was conducted to identify current best practices for user collaboration in product/service development. Second, the initial conceptual development framework was created, drawing on the strengths of different approaches. Third, the framework was applied to develop a novel early childhood parenting program (called 'Active Play'), enabling the approach to be tested and refined.
Results: Design Mapping is a three-phase framework that integrates tools from Design Thinking that emphasise meaningful and creative user collaboration, within a robust and systematic methodology inspired by Intervention Mapping. The framework also considers factors pertinent when developing both mental health and digital support programs. Preliminary findings from pilot testing of the Active Play program suggest that Design Thinking may support the development of programs that are feasible, effective and engaging.
Conclusion: Design Mapping offers a novel conceptual codesign methodology for developing robust, evidence-based support programs that are responsive to diverse user needs and preferences. The next step is to evaluate its effectiveness in comparison to existing methodologies.
Public Contribution: This article presents Design Mapping, a novel conceptual framework that offers a systematic approach to developing evidence-based digital mental health programs, emphasising meaningful and creative collaboration with end-users throughout. The primary aim of this article is to explore and address current limitations in codesign practices in the healthcare industry, consider best practice for user collaboration in the development of digital mental health programs, and provide clear and pragmatic descriptions of suggested methods, with sufficient detail to support real-world utilisation. The Design Mapping framework was conceptualised, tested and refined via the development of a novel early-childhood parenting support smartphone-app, called 'Daily Growth' (Figure 2). End-users were involved throughout the development of Daily Growth, from initial program inception through to prototype testing and refinement. This article presents an overview of the development of Daily Growth to illustrate the application of Design Mapping, with other publications providing an in-depth account of the methodology.
(© 2025 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)