Treffer: Success in goal-directed visual tasks: the benefits of alternating sitting and standing instead of only sitting.

Title:
Success in goal-directed visual tasks: the benefits of alternating sitting and standing instead of only sitting.
Authors:
Cherigui W; Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193, SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, F-59000, Lille, France., Guillaume M; Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193, SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, F-59000, Lille, France., Rodrigues ST; Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Sciences, Laboratory of Information, Vision and Action (LIVIA), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil., Bonnet CT; Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193, SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, F-59000, Lille, France. Electronic address: cedrick.bonnet@univ-lille.fr.
Source:
Applied ergonomics [Appl Ergon] 2025 Nov; Vol. 129, pp. 104611. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Jul 28.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Butterworth-Heinemann Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0261412 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1872-9126 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00036870 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Appl Ergon Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Oxford : Butterworth-Heinemann
Original Publication: London.
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Alternating positions; Reaction time; Sitting vs. standing; Visual attention; Young adults
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20250729 Date Completed: 20250910 Latest Revision: 20250910
Update Code:
20250911
DOI:
10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104611
PMID:
40729900
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

Both excessive sitting and excessive standing have been shown to be detrimental for performance, productivity and health. In the present study, our objective was specifically to determine the effect of alternating the body position (between standing and sitting) on task performance and visual attention in the Attention Network Task (ANT), relative to a sitting-only condition. Twenty-four participants (aged 18-35) performed the ANT six times in both conditions (5 min 35 per ANT). The proportion of blinks was significantly lower in the alternating condition than in the sitting-only condition. In both between-condition and within-condition analyses, the reaction times were significantly shorter when standing than when sitting. Humans may be more effective (i.e. a shorter reaction time) and have greater visual attention (i.e. less frequent proportion of blinking) in an alternating condition than in a sitting-only condition. In practice, the use of sit-stand desks might usefully help to both reduce the time spent sitting and improve task performance.
(Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Declaration of competing interest In the manuscript “Success in goal-directed visual tasks: the benefits of alternating sitting and standing instead of only sitting”, by Wafâ Cherigui, Mélen Guillaume, Sergio T. Rodrigues and Cédrick T. Bonnet, there is no conflict of interest to declare.