Treffer: Prenatal diagnosis and genetic assessment of fetuses with single umbilical artery using chromosomal microarray analysis: a seven-year single-center retrospective study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):B2-9. (PMID: 27427470)
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Mar 04;39(8):e70. (PMID: 38442716)
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 10;40(9):1051-1061. (PMID: 37643949)
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018 Mar;45(1):55-68. (PMID: 29428286)
Korean J Lab Med. 2010 Aug;30(4):440-3. (PMID: 20805718)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jan;184:80-3. (PMID: 25463640)
Ultrasound Q. 2007 Jun;23(2):117-21. (PMID: 17538487)
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;163(3):922-5. (PMID: 2403169)
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;36(3):291-5. (PMID: 20549772)
Am J Perinatol. 2010 Apr;27(4):321-4. (PMID: 19856263)
Mol Cytogenet. 2019 Dec 11;12:50. (PMID: 31857824)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 15;22(1):327. (PMID: 35428251)
J Ultrasound Med. 1998 Dec;17(12):765-8. (PMID: 9849950)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):494. (PMID: 39039444)
Minerva Ginecol. 2005 Apr;57(2):189-98. (PMID: 15940081)
Prenat Diagn. 2012 Apr;32(4):351-61. (PMID: 22467166)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):94. (PMID: 33509128)
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S83-4. (PMID: 26015760)
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jun;34(6):581-5. (PMID: 24596225)
Prenat Diagn. 2005 Dec;25(12):1133-7. (PMID: 16231301)
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;22(6):567-70. (PMID: 14689527)
Prenat Diagn. 2000 Feb;20(2):152-5. (PMID: 10694689)
Prenat Diagn. 1994 Jan;14(1):13-6. (PMID: 8183832)
Ital J Pediatr. 2013 Jan 23;39:6. (PMID: 23343423)
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 10;38(12):1165-1170. (PMID: 34839499)
Pediatr Neonatol. 2008 Dec;49(6):230-3. (PMID: 19166120)
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Oct;5(10):101072. (PMID: 37393030)
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):843-850. (PMID: 20859147)
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;126(4):760-764. (PMID: 26348181)
Prenat Diagn. 2007 Apr;27(4):327-31. (PMID: 17286313)
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 27;14(1):2271. (PMID: 38280885)
Weitere Informationen
Background: The inherited causes behind fetuses with a single umbilical artery (SUA) are still poorly understood, largely because published studies are scarce. In the present research, efforts were made to uncover the genetic factors at play and to assess how SUA influences pregnancy outcome.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 5,014 pregnant individuals who underwent prenatal diagnostic testing between September 2017 and April 2023. Of these, 123 fetuses were found to have SUA. Amniocentesis was carried out in all affected cases, with samples analyzed via conventional karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) to detect any chromosomal abnormalities.
Results: In the present study, four cases of chromosome aneuploid and two cases of chromosomal structural abnormalities were identified through karyotype analysis, with the chromosomal aberration detection rate being 4.88% (6/123). CMA confirmed every abnormality detected by conventional karyotyping and additionally identified 11 pathogenic copy number variants that had been missed. These novel findings included clinically significant conditions such as Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome, Xq28 duplication syndrome, 16p13.3 duplication syndrome, 16p11.2 deletion syndrome, and 22q11.21 deletion syndrome. Overall, CMA provided an incremental diagnostic yield of 8.94% (11/123) beyond what karyotyping alone achieved (P = 0.001).
Conclusion: CMA markedly improved the identification of clinically relevant genetic alterations in fetuses presenting with a single umbilical artery, especially when the anomaly occurred in isolation. These findings highlight the value of CMA for uncovering the genetic contributors to SUA and advance the characterization of genotype-phenotype relationships in these cases.
(© 2025. The Author(s).)
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Quanzhou Women’s and Children’s Hospital before the commencement of the study (2023No.56). We received informed consent from the participants in the study and they agreed to the publication of the report. All procedures involving human participants followed the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Consent for publication: We confirm that written informed consent was signed by the parents for the publication of their own and their children’s genetic data and relevant information. The written informed consent is available on request. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.