Treffer: Investigating the Independent and Combined Effects of Startle and Surprise in a Simulated Flight Task.

Title:
Investigating the Independent and Combined Effects of Startle and Surprise in a Simulated Flight Task.
Authors:
Duchevet A; Fédération ENAC ISAE-SUPAERO ONERA, Université de Toulouse, France., Imbert JP; Fédération ENAC ISAE-SUPAERO ONERA, Université de Toulouse, France., Garcia J; Fédération ENAC ISAE-SUPAERO ONERA, Université de Toulouse, France., Lamirault B; Bordeaux INP-ENSC, IMS UMR, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS Talence, France., Causse M; Fédération ENAC ISAE-SUPAERO ONERA, Université de Toulouse, France.
Source:
Human factors [Hum Factors] 2025 Nov; Vol. 67 (11), pp. 1170-1187. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 May 15.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0374660 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1547-8181 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00187208 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Hum Factors Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Santa Monica, Ca : Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Original Publication: New York, N.Y. : Pergamon Press, 1958-4
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: aviation; eye-tracking; heart rate; skin conductance
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20250515 Date Completed: 20251021 Latest Revision: 20251021
Update Code:
20251021
DOI:
10.1177/00187208251342100
PMID:
40373188
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

ObjectiveWe aimed to characterize the impact of startle and surprise, both independently and in combination, on subjective feelings, behavior (task performance and gaze behavior), and several physiological parameters.BackgroundThe effects of startle and surprise are known to affect pilots' cognitive performance, with potential impact on safety. Startle and surprise can occur either together or independently, yet no studies have experimentally distinguished their specific effects.MethodParticipants ( n = 45) were each assigned to one of the three conditions while performing the MATB-II task. In the startle condition, participants were subjected to an expected loud sound. In the surprise condition, an unexpected reverse video effect was applied to the experimental interface. In the combination condition, participants were exposed to both stimuli simultaneously.ResultsSurprise was associated with an increase in skin conductance without affecting performance. In contrast, startle was marked by a decline in performance on the communication sub-task, increased skin conductance and heart rate, and a narrowing of attention. When startle and surprise were combined, the results mirrored those of startle alone but included a stronger feeling of startle and surprise, and a more prolonged heart rate increase.ConclusionStartle and surprise combined yielded more numerous significant effects on subjective, behavioral, and physiological measures than startle and surprise independently.ApplicationIdentifying the specific impacts of startle and surprise could pave the way for their automatic detection using artificial intelligence. Safety could be enhanced through the design of specific countermeasures to help the crew cope with such states.

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.