Treffer: Enhancement of standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index predictions by machine learning based on regression and soft computing for Iran's arid and hyper-arid region.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(35):84474-84490. (PMID: 37369900)
Sci Total Environ. 2018 May 1;622-623:710-720. (PMID: 29223897)
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jan 1;185:31-43. (PMID: 28029478)
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(3):4128-4144. (PMID: 34403057)
J Environ Manage. 2021 Apr 1;283:111979. (PMID: 33482453)
J Contam Hydrol. 2021 Jun;240:103781. (PMID: 33799017)
Weitere Informationen
Drought is a climate risk that affects access to safe water, crop development, ecological stability, and food production. Therefore, developing drought prediction methods can lead to better management of surface and groundwater resources. Similarly, machine learning can be used to find improved relationships between nonlinear variables in complex systems. Initially, the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) was calculated, and then using large-scale signals such as large-scale climate signals (the North Atlantic Oscillation, the Arctic Oscillation, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, and the Southern Oscillation Index), along with climatic variables including temperature, precipitation, and potential evapotranspiration, predictions were made for the period of 1966-2014. Several new machine learning models including Least Square Support Vector Regression (LSSVR), Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH), and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) were used for prediction. The results showed that in estimating SPEI in moderately arid climates, the GMDH model with criteria (RMSE = 0.26, MAE = 0.17, NSE = 0.95 in validation) under scenario S1 (included all variables plus the SPEI of the previous month) performed better, while in arid and cold climates, the LSSVR model (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.18, NSE = 0.95 in validation) under S1, and in arid and hot climate, the LSSVR model (RMSE = 0.29, MAE = 0.19, NSE = 0.93 in validation) under scenario S2 (included meteorological variables plus the SPEI of the previous month) had higher prediction accuracy. Although the MARS model was less accurate in validation, it showed higher accuracy during calibration compared to the other two models in all climates. The results showed that using large-scale signals for predicting SPEI was beneficial. It can be concluded that machine learning models are useful tools for predicting the SPEI drought index in different climates within similar ranges.
(Copyright: © 2025 Bour et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.