Treffer: Is double-blind peer review detrimental to scientific integrity? Author's reply.

The article discusses the potential detrimental effects of double-blind peer review on scientific integrity, particularly in the field of environmental sciences. The author argues that while double-blind review aims to reduce bias, it may inadvertently allow questionable or fraudulent research to be published, posing a significant threat to the credibility of scientific journals. The text highlights recent incidents of retractions and delistings of major journals due to publishing fraudulent articles, emphasizing the need for more transparent and open review processes. The author also critiques the current practices surrounding data availability and conflict of interest disclosures, advocating for greater transparency to enhance scientific rigor. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)